Christian Louboutin Heels

rk is featured in some of the world greatest museums. An early run or bike ride through Parque del Retiro (Madrid answer to Central Park), followed by a del left David behind by nature of the way Feet Under ended where we all got to simulate our own deaths. When we talked last night, was a bit jet lagged after flying in from a film set in Australia for an Academy of Television Arts and Sciences event where most of the cast gathered for a screening of an upcoming episode and a discussion after. I didn mention the irony of interviewing Michael at the Academy headquarters in North Hollywood (and his appearance on the cover of Emmy Magazine) given that he was snubbed for a much deserved Emmy nomination this year. Not only should he have been nominated, but he should have won! I wondered if it been tougher to play Dexter this season now that the show has moved beyond establishing his character and has him juggling his duel roles as serial killer (he only kills bad guys!) and forensics specia Christian Louboutin Heels harm: the gallery reportedly raised his price from 12,500 euros to 100,000 for which they have already received at least one offer. But far more to the point is whether this actually is an art work or a stunt a question that can only be answered by reviewing Jansen's own real intentions, the nature of his oeuvre, the body of his aesthetic. My paintings and installations are mostly about the bycatch of human activity and the race for technological progress in combination with the human error that surrounds this progress. My work highlights situations that show the skewed balance between what we want and what we actually get, when we try to achieve that goal. My installations are mostly inventions, new machines. Devices that fulfill meaningless functions. One condition goes: they must work. Like any other invention they're about the automation of processes in order to ease the living of mankind. My devices do exactly that, they automate a certain function. The difference is that the Christian Louboutin Heels need for these specific functions is questionable.?A Different Kind of Race By Fitz Cahall, watch more Fringe Elements videos and get advice from the athletes Even the biggest tidal races can be caught when they are small, says sea kayaker Paul Kuthe of the river like currents, whirlpools, and rapids that tidal shifts can cause in the ocean. Most can be paddled into when they are completely flat. Then the rapid slowly builds around you. You can scout it out this way.Paddling tidal races the river like currents, whirlpools, and rapids that tidal shifts can cause in the ocean requires mastery of basic sea kayaking skills. Before you drop in, you should be confident with your ability to roll a kayak, know how to re enter your boat in open water should you swim (fall out of your kayak), and formulate a basic understanding of all the entry and possible escape points inside a tidal race. Where to Go Deception Pass on Whidbey Island, located an hour and a half north of Seattle, and Yello Christian Louboutin Heels w Bluffs in San Francisco Bay are the best entry points for sea kayakers looking to make the leap into tidal race paddling, says sea kayaker Paul Kuthe. They contain similar features standing waves, chop, and whirlpools to the tidal races seen in Fringe Elements, just on a smaller scale. A few sea kayaking outfitters offer guided trips to these zones where paddlers can develop the skills they will need for bigger races, such as British Columbia Skookumchuck Narrows, under a guide's watchful eye. These are good places for people to cut their teeth and figure out how to paddle in tidal races, says Kuthe. Stay Warm With their proximity to major metropolitan areas, Deception Pass and Yellow Bluffs are also the easiest tidal races to get to. These are cold water locals where water temperatures hover in the 50s, so come prepared. Even with a dry suit and insulation underneath, a kayaker who comes out of his or her boat only has 20 minutes before hypothermia sets in, warns Kuthe. Trendy UGG
New Logo

I anticipate the alleged value, is that Rolex has a about ample trading market, if you wish to buy out the table will be about easy, but aswell because of rolex replica Rolex's Models are absurd to change, about can advertise a little expensive. But like the annual one hundred thousand to buy aback the Rolex, cutting two years, would like to advertise one hundred thousand, it is absurd to estimate, because For the use of replica watch the process, the movement will abrasion and tear, the artefact will be damaged. If the adored metal table may be better. In fact, the apple in accession to their own, there is no East West is to bottle the bulk of the house, and now looks actual admired but aswell a lot of rolex replica appreciation, but actually bulk it? To our next generation, a child's easily are a few sets Room, it is estimated that the bulk will be the bulk of cabbage. So, wish to buy a table if you buy it, do not accede the bulk of the matter. If you actually wish to hedge, buy a large Gold armlet on duke to solve.


A new 300 page report published in November outlines the serious negative impact of livestock on the planet's precious resources. It pointed out that more global warming gases are attributable to livestock than to the entire transportation sector. In addition, livestock is the largest source of water pollution in many countries and a leading cause of loss of biodiversity worldwide.

Of course, this report strongly reinforces the message that those of us running HealthyPlanet have been disseminating for many years. And yet, we still often hear the issue of global warming being discussed — with solutions being offered — and no mention of the crucial role played by livestock production. With the world population rising rapidly and millions dying of hunger while our rainforests and other sensitive ecosystems are being destroyed, this report adds to the voices now saying that if we are truly seeking solutions, we can no longer ignore the massive impact of livestock production — and in turn, the important role that each one of us can play — by choosing foods that are lower on the food chain. And as the report points out, such choices would clearly benefit our health as well, with concurrent decreases in our rates of diseases from heart disease to cancer to diabetes and more.

Here's the executive summary of the report:

Executive summary

This report aims to assess the full impact of the livestock sector on environmental problems, along with potential technical and policy approaches to mitigation. The assessment is based on the most recent and complete data available, taking into account direct impacts, along with the impacts of feedcrop agriculture required for livestock production.

The livestock sector emerges as one of the top two or three most significant contributors to the most serious environmental problems, at every scale from local to global. The findings of this report suggest that it should be a major policy focus when dealing with problems of land degradation, climate change and air pollution, water shortage and water pollution and loss of biodiversity.

Livestock's contribution to environmental problems is on a massive scale and its potential contribution to their solution is equally large. The impact is so significant that it needs to be addressed with urgency. Major reductions in impact could be achieved at reasonable cost.

Global importance of the sector

Although economically not a major global player, the livestock sector is socially and politically very significant. It accounts for 40 percent of agricultural gross domestic product (GDP). It employs 1.3 billion people and creates livelihoods for one billion of the world's poor. Livestock products provide one-third of humanity's protein intake, and are a contributing cause of obesity and a potential remedy for undernourishment.

Growing populations and incomes, along with changing food preferences, are rapidly increasing demand for livestock products, while globalization is boosting trade in livestock inputs and products. Global production of meat is projected to more than double from 229 million tonnes in 1999/01 to 465 million tonnes in 2050, and that of milk to grow from 580 to 1 043 million tonnes. The environmental impact per unit of livestock production must be cut by half, just to avoid increasing the level of damage beyond its present level.

Structural changes and their impact

The livestock sector is undergoing a complex process of technical and geographical change, which is shifting the balance of environmental problems caused by the sector.

Extensive grazing still occupies and degrades vast areas of land; though there is an increasing trend towards intensification and industrialization. Livestock production is shifting geographically, first from rural areas to urban and peri-urban, to get closer to consumers, then towards the sources of feedstuff, whether these are feedcrop areas, or transport and trade hubs where feed is imported. There is also a shift of species, with production of monogastric species (pigs and poultry, mostly produced in industrial units) growing rapidly, while the growth of ruminant production (cattle, sheep and goats, often raised extensively) slows. Through these shifts, the livestock sector enters into more and direct competition for scarce land, water and other natural resources.

These changes are pushing towards improved efficiency, thus reducing the land area required for livestock production. At the same time, they are marginalizing smallholders and pastoralists, increasing inputs and wastes and increasing and concentrating the pollution created. Widely dispersed non-point sources of pollution are ceding importance to point sources that create more local damage but are more easily regulated.

Land degradation

The livestock sector is by far the single largest anthropogenic user of land. The total area occupied by grazing is equivalent to 26 percent of the ice-free terrestrial surface of the planet. In addition, the total area dedicated to feedcrop production amounts to 33 percent of total arable land. In all, livestock production accounts for 70 percent of all agricultural land and 30 percent of the land surface of the planet.

Expansion of livestock production is a key factor in deforestation, especially in Latin America where the greatest amount of deforestation is occurring — 70 percent of previous forested land in the Amazon is occupied by pastures, and feedcrops cover a large part of the remainder. About 20 percent of the world's pastures and rangelands, with 73 percent of rangelands in dry areas, have been degraded to some extent, mostly through overgrazing, compaction and erosion created by livestock action. The dry lands in particular are affected by these trends, as livestock are often the only source of livelihoods for the people living in these areas.

Overgrazing can be reduced by grazing fees and by removing obstacles to mobility on common property pastures. Land degradation can be limited and reversed through soil conservation methods, silvopastoralism, better management of grazing systems, limits to uncontrolled burning by pastoralists and controlled exclusion from sensitive areas.

Atmosphere and climate

With rising temperatures, rising sea levels, melting icecaps and glaciers, shifting ocean currents and weather patterns, climate change is the most serious challenge facing the human race.

The livestock sector is a major player, responsible for 18 percent of greenhouse gas emissions measured in CO2 equivalent. This is a higher share than transport.

The livestock sector accounts for 9 percent of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. The largest share of this derives from land-use changes — especially deforestation — caused by expansion of pastures and arable land for feedcrops. Livestock are responsible for much larger shares of some gases with far higher potential to warm the atmosphere. The sector emits 37 percent of anthropogenic methane (with 23 times the global warming potential (GWP) of CO2) most of that from enteric fermentation by ruminants. It emits 65 percent of anthropogenic nitrous oxide (with 296 times the GWP of CO2), the great majority from manure. Livestock are also responsible for almost two-thirds (64 percent) of anthropogenic ammonia emissions, which contribute significantly to acid rain and acidification of ecosystems.

This high level of emissions opens up large opportunities for climate change mitigation through livestock actions. Intensification — in terms of increased productivity both in livestock production and in feedcrop agriculture — can reduce greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and pasture degradation. In addition, restoring historical losses of soil carbon through conservation tillage, cover crops, agroforestry and other measures could sequester up to 1.3 tonnes of carbon per hectare per year, with additional amounts available through restoration of desertified pastures. Methane emissions can be reduced through improved diets to reduce enteric fermentation, improved manure management and biogas — which also provide renewable energy. Nitrogen emissions can be reduced through improved diets and manure management.

The Kyoto Protocol's clean development mechanism (CDM) can be used to finance the spread of biogas and silvopastoral initiatives involving afforestation and reforestation. Methodologies should be developed so that the CDM can finance other livestock-related options such as soil carbon sequestration through rehabilitation of degraded pastures.


The world is moving towards increasing problems of freshwater shortage, scarcity and depletion, with 64 percent of the world's population expected to live in water-stressed basins by 2025. The livestock sector is a key player in increasing water use, accounting for over 8 percent of global human water use, mostly for the irrigation of feedcrops. It is probably the largest sectoral source of water pollution, contributing to eutrophication, “dead” zones in coastal areas, degradation of coral reefs, human health problems, emergence of antibiotic resistance and many others. The major sources of pollution are from animal wastes, antibiotics and hormones, chemicals from tanneries, fertilizers and pesticides used for feedcrops, and sediments from eroded pastures. Global figures are not available but in the United States, with the world's fourth largest land area, livestock are responsible for an estimated 55 percent of erosion and sediment, 37 percent of pesticide use, 50 percent of antibiotic use, and a third of the loads of nitrogen and phosphorus into freshwater resources.

Livestock also affect the replenishment of freshwater by compacting soil, reducing infiltration, degrading the banks of watercourses, drying up floodplains and lowering water tables. Livestock's contribution to deforestation also increases runoff and reduces dry season flows.

Water use can be reduced through improving the efficiency of irrigation systems. Livestock's impact on erosion, sedimentation and water regulation can be addressed by measures against land degradation. Pollution can be tackled through better management of animal waste in industrial production units, better diets to improve nutrient absorption, improved manure management (including biogas) and better use of processed manure on croplands. Industrial livestock production should be decentralized to accessible croplands where wastes can be recycled without overloading soils and freshwater.

Policy measures that would help in reducing water use and pollution include full cost pricing of water (to cover supply costs, as well as economic and environmental externalities), regulatory frameworks for limiting inputs and scale, specifying required equipment and discharge levels, zoning regulations and taxes to discourage large-scale concentrations close to cities, as well as the development of secure water rights and water markets, and participatory management of watersheds.


We are in an era of unprecedented threats to biodiversity. The loss of species is estimated to be running 50 to 500 times higher than background rates found in the fossil record. Fifteen out of 24 important ecosystem services are assessed to be in decline.

Livestock now account for about 20 percent of the total terrestrial animal biomass, and the 30 percent of the earth's land surface that they now pre-empt was once habitat for wildlife. Indeed, the livestock sector may well be the leading player in the reduction of biodiversity, since it is the major driver of deforestation, as well as one of the leading drivers of land degradation, pollution, climate change, overfishing, sedimentation of coastal areas and facilitation of invasions by alien species. In addition, resource conflicts with pastoralists threaten species of wild predators and also protected areas close to pastures. Meanwhile in developed regions, especially Europe, pastures had become a location of diverse long-established types of ecosystem, many of which are now threatened by pasture abandonment.

Some 306 of the 825 terrestrial ecoregions identified by the Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF) — ranged across all biomes and all biogeographical realms, reported livestock as one of the current threats. Conservation International has identified 35 global hotspots for biodiversity, characterized by exceptional levels of plant endemism and serious levels of habitat loss. Of these, 23 are reported to be affected by livestock production. An analysis of the authoritative World Conservation Union (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species shows that most of the world's threatened species are suffering habitat loss where livestock are a factor.

Since many of livestock's threats to biodiversity arise from their impact on the main resource sectors (climate, air and water pollution, land degradation and deforestation), major options for mitigation are detailed in those sections. There is also scope for improving pastoralists' interactions with wildlife and parks and raising wildlife species in livestock enterprises.

Reduction of the wildlife area pre-empted by livestock can be achieved by intensification. Protection of wild areas, buffer zones, conservation easements, tax credits and penalties can increase the amount of land where biodiversity conservation is prioritized. Efforts should extend more widely to integrate livestock production and producers into landscape management.

Cross-cutting policy frameworks

Certain general policy approaches cut across all the above fields. A general conclusion is that improving the resource use efficiency of livestock production can reduce environmental impacts. While regulating about scale, inputs, wastes and so on can help, a crucial element in achieving greater efficiency is the correct pricing of natural resources such as land, water and use of waste sinks. Most frequently natural resources are free or underpriced, which leads to overexploitation and pollution. Often perverse subsidies directly encourage livestock producers to engage in environmentally damaging activities. A top priority is to achieve prices and fees that reflect the full economic and environmental costs, including all externalities. One requirement for prices to influence behaviour is that there should be secure and if possible tradable rights to water, land, use of common land and waste sinks.

Damaging subsidies should be removed, and economic and environmental externalities should be built into prices by selective taxing of and/or fees for resource use, inputs and wastes. In some cases direct incentives may be needed.

Payment for environmental services is an important framework, especially in relation to extensive grazing systems: herders, producers and landowners can be paid for specific environmental services such as regulation of water flows, soil conservation, conservation of natural landscape and wildlife habitats, or carbon sequestration. Provision of environmental services may emerge as a major purpose of extensive grassland-based production systems.

An important general lesson is that the livestock sector has such deep and wide-ranging environmental impacts that it should rank as one of the leading focuses for environmental policy: efforts here can produce large and multiple payoffs. Indeed, as societies develop, it is likely that environmental considerations, along with human health issues, will become the dominant policy considerations for the sector.

Finally, there is an urgent need to develop suitable institutional and policy frameworks, at local, national and international levels, for the suggested changes to occur. This will require strong political commitment, and increased knowledge and awareness of the environmental risks of continuing “business as usual” and the environmental benefits of actions in the livestock sector.

HealthyPlanet • 55 Gerard St. #163, Huntington NY 11743
Phone: 631-421-5591


Turkey Free
SUN., NOV. 20th
(Click for more details)

Date to be announced


Radio Show
(Click Here for Upcoming Shows!)